
2 120066825 2013-03-13 20:20:45 +08:00 64 bytes from 50.31.240.135: icmp_seq=0 ttl=48 time=149.252 ms 64 bytes from 50.31.240.135: icmp_seq=1 ttl=48 time=150.186 ms 64 bytes from 50.31.240.135: icmp_seq=2 ttl=48 time=145.498 ms 64 bytes from 50.31.240.135: icmp_seq=3 ttl=48 time=144.038 ms 64 bytes from 50.31.240.135: icmp_seq=4 ttl=48 time=143.723 ms 64 bytes from 50.31.240.135: icmp_seq=5 ttl=48 time=142.847 ms 64 bytes from 50.31.240.135: icmp_seq=6 ttl=48 time=151.384 ms 64 bytes from 50.31.240.135: icmp_seq=7 ttl=48 time=146.776 ms 64 bytes from 50.31.240.135: icmp_seq=8 ttl=48 time=150.718 ms 64 bytes from 50.31.240.135: icmp_seq=9 ttl=48 time=146.115 ms |
5 jetbillwin 2013-03-13 20:22:38 +08:00 Chrome下载,中国联通,山东,1.2MB/s |
6 iZr OP @jetbillwin 天 你哼快 |
7 icoder 2013-03-13 20:26:17 +08:00 买的那家? |
9 tedeyang 2013-03-13 20:33:04 +08:00 170KB/s,单线程下载。杭州华数网络 |
10 zhfsxtx 2013-03-13 20:35:33 +08:00 700KB/S |
11 Jevan 2013-03-13 20:49:03 +08:00 湖北联通,Chrome,900KB/s左右。感觉不错。ping值135ms左右。 |
12 xiatian 2013-03-13 21:37:54 +08:00 上海电信,Chrome,稳定在900KB/s左右。 PING 50.31.240.135 (50.31.240.135): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 50.31.240.135: icmp_seq=0 ttl=47 time=87.889 ms 64 bytes from 50.31.240.135: icmp_seq=1 ttl=47 time=86.367 ms Request timeout for icmp_seq 2 Request timeout for icmp_seq 3 Request timeout for icmp_seq 4 64 bytes from 50.31.240.135: icmp_seq=5 ttl=47 time=85.565 ms 64 bytes from 50.31.240.135: icmp_seq=6 ttl=47 time=85.954 ms 64 bytes from 50.31.240.135: icmp_seq=7 ttl=47 time=84.686 ms Request timeout for icmp_seq 8 64 bytes from 50.31.240.135: icmp_seq=9 ttl=47 time=85.431 ms --- 50.31.240.135 ping statistics --- 10 packets transmitted, 6 packets received, 40.0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 84.686/85.982/87.889/0.995 ms |
13 jqw1992 2013-03-13 22:57:40 +08:00 不错!那里买的啊 |
14 andyliu 2013-03-13 23:03:49 +08:00 vps。net? 我想说 买贵了 |
15 TankyWoo 2013-03-14 00:16:50 +08:00 北京电信通下载速度120~150K,和我刚测试过的linode 日本机房速度差不多。本地是10M宽带。 PING 50.31.240.135 (50.31.240.135) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 50.31.240.135: icmp_req=1 ttl=42 time=90.1 ms 64 bytes from 50.31.240.135: icmp_req=2 ttl=42 time=75.3 ms 64 bytes from 50.31.240.135: icmp_req=3 ttl=42 time=77.7 ms 64 bytes from 50.31.240.135: icmp_req=4 ttl=42 time=76.1 ms 64 bytes from 50.31.240.135: icmp_req=5 ttl=42 time=76.0 ms 64 bytes from 50.31.240.135: icmp_req=6 ttl=42 time=77.2 ms 64 bytes from 50.31.240.135: icmp_req=7 ttl=42 time=74.9 ms ^C --- 50.31.240.135 ping statistics --- 7 packets transmitted, 7 received, 0% packet loss, time 6054ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 74.970/78.254/90.175/4.958 ms |
16 iCodex 2013-03-14 00:57:13 +08:00 日本的已经不考虑了。 |
17 xdeng 2013-03-14 09:01:37 +08:00 深圳 2.03MB |
18 d0a1ccec 2013-03-14 09:10:34 +08:00 Macbook-Pro:~ kevnish$ ping ww.izr.la PING ww.izr.la (50.31.240.135): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 50.31.240.135: icmp_seq=0 ttl=48 time=94.575 ms 64 bytes from 50.31.240.135: icmp_seq=1 ttl=48 time=95.470 ms 64 bytes from 50.31.240.135: icmp_seq=2 ttl=48 time=91.566 ms 64 bytes from 50.31.240.135: icmp_seq=3 ttl=48 time=109.409 ms 64 bytes from 50.31.240.135: icmp_seq=4 ttl=48 time=103.901 ms 64 bytes from 50.31.240.135: icmp_seq=5 ttl=48 time=95.759 ms 64 bytes from 50.31.240.135: icmp_seq=6 ttl=48 time=97.003 ms |
19 d0a1ccec 2013-03-14 09:11:42 +08:00 traceroute to ww.izr.la (50.31.240.135), 64 hops max, 72 byte packets 1 192.168.0.1 (192.168.0.1) 7.400 ms 2.462 ms 0.982 ms 2 119.119.48.1 (119.119.48.1) 5.544 ms 7.239 ms 2.584 ms 3 218.25.8.53 (218.25.8.53) 9.968 ms 5.598 ms 3.802 ms 4 113.230.184.201 (113.230.184.201) 20.953 ms 31.806 ms 20.690 ms 5 219.158.18.17 (219.158.18.17) 57.852 ms 59.304 ms 56.935 ms 6 219.158.3.250 (219.158.3.250) 63.540 ms 55.887 ms 61.292 ms 7 219.158.96.254 (219.158.96.254) 56.628 ms 63.114 ms 83.932 ms 8 219.158.33.142 (219.158.33.142) 78.900 ms 78.827 ms 78.662 ms 9 cbcrk-05-pos10-0.gw.odn.ad.jp (210.142.163.177) 78.303 ms 78.743 ms 79.096 ms 10 stork-08p9-0.nw.odn.ad.jp (143.90.160.133) 98.224 ms 303.520 ms 159.531 ms 11 stork-07p12-0.nw.odn.ad.jp (143.90.149.118) 80.382 ms 80.943 ms 83.577 ms 12 storw-12t2-1.nw.odn.ad.jp (143.90.192.134) 90.744 ms 88.783 ms * 13 26.143090232.odn.ne.jp (143.90.232.26) 100.614 ms 93.668 ms 91.979 ms 14 xe-0-0-0.gw402.ty1.ap.equinix.com (202.177.203.53) 96.241 ms * 165.067 ms 15 xe-1-1-1.gw401.ty1.ap.equinix.com (183.177.32.146) 92.384 ms 90.046 ms 99.846 ms 16 202.177.202.226 (202.177.202.226) 90.045 ms 90.659 ms 90.529 ms 17 tge2-3.ar1.tko1.jp.scnet.net (75.102.60.153) 82.303 ms 81.258 ms 79.492 ms 18 as32780.ge3-42.ar1.tko1.jp.scnet.net (75.102.60.22) 91.168 ms 92.354 ms 91.088 ms 19 50.31.240.135.static.midphase.com (50.31.240.135) 90.235 ms 92.823 ms 93.955 ms |
22 hugsky 2013-03-14 11:00:54 +08:00 500KB/S 安徽合肥电信 |
23 zooandzoo 2013-03-14 12:58:35 +08:00 山东联通1.5m/S在哪买的??? |
24 sevenday 2013-03-14 13:16:54 +08:00 500KB/S 云南丽江电信 速度好快吖~ |
26 imcj 2013-03-14 13:58:40 +08:00 话说哪买的? |
27 jetbillwin 2013-03-14 14:06:30 +08:00 @zooandzoo 日本部分vps都可以吧,尤其是联通线路优化的,我的是樱花,速度也能跑满速 |
30 AsaMyth 2013-03-14 15:00:09 +08:00 教育网来怒刷下存在感么=。= 下载速度100K左右 ping 平均值 139ms Pinging 50.31.240.135 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 50.31.240.135: bytes=32 time=140ms TTL=44 Reply from 50.31.240.135: bytes=32 time=141ms TTL=44 Reply from 50.31.240.135: bytes=32 time=140ms TTL=44 Reply from 50.31.240.135: bytes=32 time=138ms TTL=44 Ping statistics for 50.31.240.135: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 138ms, Maximum = 141ms, Average = 139ms |
31 thedevil5032 2013-03-14 15:08:17 +08:00 via iPad PING 50.31.240.135 (50.31.240.135) 56(84) bytes of data. x~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 64 bytes from 50.31.240.135: icmp_seq=1 ttl=43 time=84.2 ms x~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 64 bytes from 50.31.240.135: icmp_seq=2 ttl=43 time=84.3 ms x~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 64 bytes from 50.31.240.135: icmp_seq=3 ttl=43 time=85.0 ms x~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 64 bytes from 50.31.240.135: icmp_seq=4 ttl=43 time=83.6 ms x~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 64 bytes from 50.31.240.135: icmp_seq=5 ttl=43 time=84.4 ms x~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 64 bytes from 50.31.240.135: icmp_seq=6 ttl=43 time=84.1 ms x~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 64 bytes from 50.31.240.135: icmp_seq=7 ttl=43 time=84.4 ms x~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 64 bytes from 50.31.240.135: icmp_seq=8 ttl=43 time=85.5 ms x~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 64 bytes from 50.31.240.135: icmp_seq=9 ttl=43 time=84.6 ms x~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 64 bytes from 50.31.240.135: icmp_seq=10 ttl=43 time=84.3 ms x~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 64 bytes from 50.31.240.135: icmp_seq=11 ttl=43 time=84.5 ms x~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 64 bytes from 50.31.240.135: icmp_seq=12 ttl=43 time=83.7 ms x~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^C --- 50.31.240.135 ping statistics --- 12 packets transmitted, 12 received, 0% packet loss, time 11016ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 83.680/84.426/85.585/0.494 ms 重庆教育网。 |
32 iZr OP @thedevil5032 重庆美女多吗? |
33 drupal 2013-03-14 17:30:58 +08:00 正在 Ping www.izr.la [42.121.121.154] 具有 32 字节的数据: 来自 42.121.121.154 的回复: 字节=32 时间=33ms TTL=53 来自 42.121.121.154 的回复: 字节=32 时间=33ms TTL=53 来自 42.121.121.154 的回复: 字节=32 时间=42ms TTL=53 来自 42.121.121.154 的回复: 字节=32 时间=28ms TTL=53 42.121.121.154 的 Ping 统计信息: 数据包: 已发送 = 4,已接收 = 4,丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失), 往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位): 最短 = 28ms,最长 = 42ms,平均 = 34ms ------------------------------------------ 广东电信,下载速度达到2.5M |
35 thedevil5032 2013-03-14 19:56:20 +08:00 |
36 iZr OP @thedevil5032 是吗,好泡吗? |
37 citydog 2013-03-14 22:54:03 +08:00 河北联通,8M光纤,下载到770KB/S,不错~~ |
39 kennedy32 2013-03-15 00:39:21 +08:00 IP显示是美国 伊利诺伊州芝加哥Server Central网络公司 |
40 ashchan 2013-03-15 09:54:33 +08:00 日本这边下载速度很好,跟 Linode 东京速度差不多,都在 9MB/s 左右。 |
41 zewenzhang 2013-03-15 15:16:21 +08:00 山东联通 来自 50.31.240.135 的回复: 字节=32 时间=150ms TTL=47 来自 50.31.240.135 的回复: 字节=32 时间=150ms TTL=47 来自 50.31.240.135 的回复: 字节=32 时间=151ms TTL=47 来自 50.31.240.135 的回复: 字节=32 时间=151ms TTL=47 ping值不理想啊,推荐使用Oneaisahost,新加坡机房,速度很快,价格又便宜的多 附上我的VPS 正在 Ping kia.is3w.com [116.251.209.158] 具有 32 字节的 来自 116.251.209.158 的回复: 字节=32 时间=80ms TTL=52 来自 116.251.209.158 的回复: 字节=32 时间=80ms TTL=52 来自 116.251.209.158 的回复: 字节=32 时间=80ms TTL=52 来自 116.251.209.158 的回复: 字节=32 时间=80ms TTL=52 |
42 yiqingfeng 2013-03-15 15:23:55 +08:00 貌似不错,好的话,可以搞下vps.net的分销。 |
43 iZr OP @zewenzhang 下载呢? |
44 iZr OP @zewenzhang 貌似没有货。 |
45 zewenzhang 2013-03-21 17:03:21 +08:00 @iZr 有啊,http://www.oneasiahost.com/openvz-vps.htm,点进去选PLAN OVZ-128价格是$12.00 quarterly |
46 kingdog 2013-03-21 17:20:34 +08:00 正在 Ping 50.31.240.135 具有 32 字节的数据: 来自 50.31.240.135 的回复: 字节=32 时间=74ms TTL=46 来自 50.31.240.135 的回复: 字节=32 时间=74ms TTL=46 来自 50.31.240.135 的回复: 字节=32 时间=71ms TTL=46 来自 50.31.240.135 的回复: 字节=32 时间=71ms TTL=46 江苏电信的。 |
47 nepia 2013-03-21 17:27:34 +08:00 正在 Ping 50.31.240.135 具有 32 字节的数据: 来自 50.31.240.135 的回复: 字节=32 时间=139ms TTL=41 来自 50.31.240.135 的回复: 字节=32 时间=133ms TTL=41 来自 50.31.240.135 的回复: 字节=32 时间=126ms TTL=41 来自 50.31.240.135 的回复: 字节=32 时间=128ms TTL=41 随手一ping 帝都联通 |
48 ownway 2013-03-21 20:30:34 +08:00 楼主买贵了,我的账号是2折的,应该有一大批2折账号 |
50 yinxingren 2013-03-21 21:25:33 +08:00 正在 Ping ww.izr.la [50.31.240.135] 具有 32 字节的数据: 来自 50.31.240.135 的回复: 字节=32 时间=167ms TTL=41 来自 50.31.240.135 的回复: 字节=32 时间=165ms TTL=41 来自 50.31.240.135 的回复: 字节=32 时间=164ms TTL=41 来自 50.31.240.135 的回复: 字节=32 时间=165ms TTL=41 50.31.240.135 的 Ping 统计信息: 数据包: 已发送 = 4,已接收 = 4,丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失), 往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位): 最短 = 164ms,最长 = 167ms,平均 = 165ms Chrome 下载300K/s 广东电信 20M |
53 ownway 2013-03-21 23:24:05 +08:00 |
54 ucvps 2013-03-21 23:39:33 +08:00 ucvps路过~ $15 512内存 |
55 DaniloSam 2013-03-21 23:41:19 +08:00 180 北京宽带通 |
57 vking 2013-03-22 10:28:12 +08:00 美帝G口vps表示带宽是最大的瓶颈......... root@11:~# wget http://50.31.240.135/100MB-tokyo.bin --2013-03-22 06:24:15-- http://50.31.240.135/100MB-tokyo.bin Connecting to 50.31.240.135:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream] Saving to: `100MB-tokyo.bin' 100%[=========================================================================================>] 104,857,600 944K/s in 2m 29s 2013-03-22 06:26:45 (686 KB/s) - `100MB-tokyo.bin' saved [104857600/104857600] root@11:~# ping 50.31.240.135 PING 50.31.240.135 (50.31.240.135) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 50.31.240.135: icmp_req=1 ttl=51 time=114 ms 64 bytes from 50.31.240.135: icmp_req=2 ttl=51 time=114 ms 64 bytes from 50.31.240.135: icmp_req=3 ttl=51 time=107 ms 64 bytes from 50.31.240.135: icmp_req=4 ttl=51 time=114 ms 64 bytes from 50.31.240.135: icmp_req=5 ttl=51 time=114 ms 64 bytes from 50.31.240.135: icmp_req=6 ttl=51 time=112 ms 64 bytes from 50.31.240.135: icmp_req=7 ttl=51 time=112 ms 64 bytes from 50.31.240.135: icmp_req=8 ttl=51 time=112 ms 64 bytes from 50.31.240.135: icmp_req=9 ttl=51 time=112 ms 64 bytes from 50.31.240.135: icmp_req=10 ttl=51 time=112 ms 64 bytes from 50.31.240.135: icmp_req=11 ttl=51 time=112 ms ^C --- 50.31.240.135 ping statistics --- 11 packets transmitted, 11 received, 0% packet loss, time 10013ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 107.315/112.886/114.690/1.990 ms |
58 twm 2013-03-22 10:32:17 +08:00 速度真心不错啊 |
59 47jm9ozp 2013-03-22 14:03:16 +08:00 [14:02]ooxx@cc-MBP:~$ wget http://50.31.240.135/100MB-tokyo.bin --2013-03-22 14:02:49-- http://50.31.240.135/100MB-tokyo.bin Connecting to 50.31.240.135:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream] Saving to: ‘100MB-tokyo.bin’ 0% [ ] 245,923 33.4KB/s eta 50m 49s^C 开始100多k,稳定下来30-40k,速度不行啊 |
60 47jm9ozp 2013-03-22 14:03:59 +08:00 对了,武汉教育网…… linode对比测试 [14:03]ooxx@cc-MBP:~$ wget http://speedtest.tokyo.linode.com/100MB-tokyo.bin --2013-03-22 14:03:42-- http://speedtest.tokyo.linode.com/100MB-tokyo.bin Resolving speedtest.tokyo.linode.com... 2400:8900::4b, 106.187.96.148 Connecting to speedtest.tokyo.linode.com|2400:8900::4b|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream] Saving to: ‘100MB-tokyo.bin’ 7% [==> ] 8,363,796 974KB/s eta 92s ^C |
61 commyleung 2013-03-22 17:20:42 +08:00 广东 10M 宽带,打开有点慢。。 |
62 hanchengluo 2013-03-23 10:29:14 +08:00 Reply from 50.31.240.135: bytes=32 time=71ms TTL=45 Reply from 50.31.240.135: bytes=32 time=70ms TTL=45 Reply from 50.31.240.135: bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=45 Reply from 50.31.240.135: bytes=32 time=70ms TTL=45 Reply from 50.31.240.135: bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=45 Reply from 50.31.240.135: bytes=32 time=70ms TTL=45 Reply from 50.31.240.135: bytes=32 time=70ms TTL=45 Reply from 50.31.240.135: bytes=32 time=262ms TTL=4 Reply from 50.31.240.135: bytes=32 time=144ms TTL=4 Reply from 50.31.240.135: bytes=32 time=99ms TTL=45 Reply from 50.31.240.135: bytes=32 time=70ms TTL=45 Reply from 50.31.240.135: bytes=32 time=70ms TTL=45 Reply from 50.31.240.135: bytes=32 time=70ms TTL=45 Reply from 50.31.240.135: bytes=32 time=72ms TTL=45 Reply from 50.31.240.135: bytes=32 time=71ms TTL=45 广东 4M 光纤 |
63 shougoule 2013-03-23 20:58:41 +08:00 VPS.NET的向来不给力啊,ODN线路还行,就是带宽饱和了。楼主可以考虑一下SAKURA和KDDI官方的,性价比更高。 |