这是一个创建于 2938 天前的主题，其中的信息可能已经有所发展或是发生改变。
非常好记，4 个 9，主打安全，能过滤恶意网址，延迟大概 220ms，在国内会不会成为谷歌 dns 的替代品？ http://www.solidot.org/story?sid=54530
 | 1 coolcoffee 2017-11-17 18:33:14 +08:00 没区别吧， 该污染的用 4 个 8 和 4 个 9 都一样 |
 | 2 0017 2017-11-17 20:21:04 +08:00 实测延迟小于 200ms,不过有 5%左右的丢包....... |
 | 3 Charkey 2017-11-17 22:15:24 +08:00 电信，延迟 270，丢包 0 |
 | 4 free4537 2017-11-18 13:01:05 +08:00 正在 Ping 9.9.9.9 具有 32 字节的数据: 来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=132ms TTL=50 来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=129ms TTL=50 来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=130ms TTL=50 来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=138ms TTL=50 9.9.9.9 的 Ping 统计信息: 数据包: 已发送 = 4，已接收 = 4，丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失)， 往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位): 最短 = 129ms，最长 = 138ms，平均 = 132ms C:\Users\Woodrow>nslookup www.baidu.com 9.9.9.9 DNS request timed out. timeout was 2 seconds. 服务器: UnKnown Address: 9.9.9.9 非权威应答: 名称: www.wshifen.com Addresses: 103.235.46.39 103.235.46.40 Aliases: www.baidu.com www.a.shifen.com C:\Users\Woodrow>ping 103.235.46.39 正在 Ping 103.235.46.39 具有 32 字节的数据: 来自 103.235.46.39 的回复: 字节=32 时间=334ms TTL=45 来自 103.235.46.39 的回复: 字节=32 时间=332ms TTL=45 来自 103.235.46.39 的回复: 字节=32 时间=334ms TTL=45 来自 103.235.46.39 的回复: 字节=32 时间=332ms TTL=45 103.235.46.39 的 Ping 统计信息: 数据包: 已发送 = 4，已接收 = 4，丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失)， 往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位): 最短 = 332ms，最长 = 334ms，平均 = 333ms |
 | 5 linxijun 2017-11-19 22:51:37 +08:00 Last login: Mon Nov 13 17:19:47 on ttys000 AppledeiMac:~ apple$ ping 9.9.9.9 PING 9.9.9.9 (9.9.9.9): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=0 ttl=49 time=192.231 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=1 ttl=49 time=192.957 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=2 ttl=49 time=194.162 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=3 ttl=49 time=199.639 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=4 ttl=49 time=195.579 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=5 ttl=49 time=188.395 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=6 ttl=49 time=194.712 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=7 ttl=49 time=194.363 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=8 ttl=49 time=176.555 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=9 ttl=49 time=192.603 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=10 ttl=49 time=181.162 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=11 ttl=49 time=191.578 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=12 ttl=49 time=187.295 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=13 ttl=49 time=185.596 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=14 ttl=49 time=191.280 s 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=15 ttl=49 time=193.693 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=16 ttl=49 time=194.058 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=17 ttl=49 time=204.406 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=18 ttl=49 time=189.848 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=19 ttl=49 time=186.148 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=20 ttl=49 time=199.792 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=21 ttl=49 time=187.016 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=22 ttl=49 time=183.156 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=23 ttl=49 time=183.254 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=24 ttl=49 time=185.480 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=25 ttl=49 time=180.471 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=26 ttl=49 time=188.819 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=27 ttl=49 time=185.163 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=28 ttl=49 time=183.057 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=29 ttl=49 time=190.951 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=30 ttl=49 time=192.397 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=31 ttl=49 time=184.462 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=32 ttl=49 time=185.441 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=33 ttl=49 time=276.453 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=34 ttl=49 time=186.582 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=35 ttl=49 time=184.364 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=36 ttl=49 time=178.436 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=37 ttl=49 time=186.446 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=38 ttl=49 time=180.855 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=39 ttl=49 time=193.625 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=40 ttl=49 time=183.559 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=41 ttl=49 time=190.733 ms 64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=42 ttl=49 time=191.957 ms |
Select Language