1 902115 OP Pinging 157.7.117.199 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 157.7.117.199: bytes=32 time=149ms TTL=48 Reply from 157.7.117.199: bytes=32 time=156ms TTL=48 Request timed out. Reply from 157.7.117.199: bytes=32 time=158ms TTL=48 Reply from 157.7.117.199: bytes=32 time=163ms TTL=48 Reply from 157.7.117.199: bytes=32 time=158ms TTL=48 Reply from 157.7.117.199: bytes=32 time=163ms TTL=48 Reply from 157.7.117.199: bytes=32 time=169ms TTL=48 Request timed out. Reply from 157.7.117.199: bytes=32 time=168ms TTL=48 Reply from 157.7.117.199: bytes=32 time=160ms TTL=48 Request timed out. Reply from 157.7.117.199: bytes=32 time=161ms TTL=48 Request timed out. Request timed out. Reply from 157.7.117.199: bytes=32 time=172ms TTL=48 Reply from 157.7.117.199: bytes=32 time=165ms TTL=48 Request timed out. Request timed out. Reply from 157.7.117.199: bytes=32 time=170ms TTL=48 Reply from 157.7.117.199: bytes=32 time=159ms TTL=48 Reply from 157.7.117.199: bytes=32 time=150ms TTL=48 Request timed out. Reply from 157.7.117.199: bytes=32 time=172ms TTL=48 Reply from 157.7.117.199: bytes=32 time=170ms TTL=48 Reply from 157.7.117.199: bytes=32 time=172ms TTL=48 Reply from 157.7.117.199: bytes=32 time=172ms TTL=48 Request timed out. Reply from 157.7.117.199: bytes=32 time=168ms TTL=48 Reply from 157.7.117.199: bytes=32 time=138ms TTL=48 Request timed out. Reply from 157.7.117.199: bytes=32 time=171ms TTL=48 Request timed out. Reply from 157.7.117.199: bytes=32 time=170ms TTL=48 Reply from 157.7.117.199: bytes=32 time=143ms TTL=48 Request timed out. Request timed out. Request timed out. Request timed out. Reply from 157.7.117.199: bytes=32 time=154ms TTL=48 Reply from 157.7.117.199: bytes=32 time=151ms TTL=48 Reply from 157.7.117.199: bytes=32 time=159ms TTL=48 Reply from 157.7.117.199: bytes=32 time=170ms TTL=48 Reply from 157.7.117.199: bytes=32 time=170ms TTL=48 Reply from 157.7.117.199: bytes=32 time=173ms TTL=48 Request timed out. Reply from 157.7.117.199: bytes=32 time=172ms TTL=48 Request timed out. Reply from 157.7.117.199: bytes=32 time=181ms TTL=48 Reply from 157.7.117.199: bytes=32 time=153ms TTL=48 Reply from 157.7.117.199: bytes=32 time=158ms TTL=48 Request timed out. Reply from 157.7.117.199: bytes=32 time=172ms TTL=48 Reply from 157.7.117.199: bytes=32 time=159ms TTL=48 Reply from 157.7.117.199: bytes=32 time=163ms TTL=48 Request timed out. Request timed out. Request timed out. Request timed out. Reply from 157.7.117.199: bytes=32 time=187ms TTL=48 Reply from 157.7.117.199: bytes=32 time=171ms TTL=48 Request timed out. Reply from 157.7.117.199: bytes=32 time=170ms TTL=48 Request timed out. Request timed out. Reply from 157.7.117.199: bytes=32 time=160ms TTL=48 Request timed out. Request timed out. Reply from 157.7.117.199: bytes=32 time=163ms TTL=48 Request timed out. Reply from 157.7.117.199: bytes=32 time=171ms TTL=48 Request timed out. Reply from 157.7.117.199: bytes=32 time=160ms TTL=48 Request timed out. Request timed out. Reply from 157.7.117.199: bytes=32 time=176ms TTL=48 Request timed out. Reply from 157.7.117.199: bytes=32 time=173ms TTL=48 Request timed out. Reply from 157.7.117.199: bytes=32 time=159ms TTL=48 Reply from 157.7.117.199: bytes=32 time=170ms TTL=48 Request timed out. Reply from 157.7.117.199: bytes=32 time=182ms TTL=48 Reply from 157.7.117.199: bytes=32 time=179ms TTL=48 Reply from 157.7.117.199: bytes=32 time=182ms TTL=48 Request timed out. Request timed out. Request timed out. Request timed out. Request timed out. Reply from 157.7.117.199: bytes=32 time=171ms TTL=48 Reply from 157.7.117.199: bytes=32 time=174ms TTL=48 Reply from 157.7.117.199: bytes=32 time=172ms TTL=48 Request timed out. Reply from 157.7.117.199: bytes=32 time=181ms TTL=48 |
2 902115 OP 这效果我也是醉了 |
3 Sharuru 2015-05-29 23:04:27 +08:00 这边测了一下,47ms,25% 掉包,感觉不是很理想。 |
![]() | 4 halczy 2015-05-29 23:06:12 +08:00 ![]() 广州这边有香港SoftLayer, 10ms延迟. |
5 goodbest 2015-05-29 23:09:21 +08:00 广州为什么不去conoha新加坡 |
6 goodbest 2015-05-29 23:13:53 +08:00 @902115 conoha新版有新加坡可选,测试网关163.44.132.1 顺便,小尾巴,注册可得1k日元 https://www.conoha.jp/referral/?token=Bze63ejH7Uphh.3bwt8ju2_SPfD5GBfFSxIYi1RQ6yOiIgzzV7k-HLY |
7 xenme 2015-05-29 23:15:30 +08:00 1. 上海电信100M,上行只有4M,最近搞活动升级到10M 了,分享给你还是比较捉急 2. 即使在广州,离香港那么近,搞个 VPS,绕香港,也比绕上海快多了啊 |
![]() | 8 PESH 2015-05-29 23:17:09 +08:00 换个IP段 ping 会减100MS |
9 902115 OP 这边测了一下,47ms,25% 掉包,感觉不是很理想。 我试了移动还可以 值钱联通的效果还OK 后来也不行了 电信更加蛋疼 |
10 902115 OP 广州这边有香港SoftLayer, 10ms延迟 OK 我找下 3Q |
![]() | 11 bellchu 2015-05-29 23:27:55 +08:00 为啥要17个IP的V P S...... 广州用香港Softlayer是多么幸福的事情 CN2过到日本的大多数网络都要15个以上的HOP,像conoha这种用ntt的都是掉包很多的 另外:要E3和i7做啥用? |
12 902115 OP 广州为什么不去conoha新加坡 因为需要用到日本IP 汗 没想过CONOHA新加坡中转 因为不知道有新加坡版 哈 3Q 晚点买一个试下 |
13 902115 OP 1. 上海电信100M,上行只有4M,最近搞活动升级到10M 了,分享给你还是比较捉急 2. 即使在广州,离香港那么近,搞个 VPS,绕香港,也比绕上海快多了啊 1:200M的国际精品网有20M上传 我大概10M足以 2:香港的VPS.经常无缘无故大规模丢包 可能是我没买到好的吧 |
14 902115 OP 换个IP段 ping 会减100MS 换了多个段了 之前电信过去还行 现在简直没法用 来去弄个新加坡CONOHA试下 3Q |
![]() | 15 PESH 2015-05-29 23:49:10 +08:00 我这佛山电信在5月初起 出口也特别慢了 之前出口到新加坡 ping都在50以下用SS可跑到40M 现在动不动就180-200MS多 用SS只有1-2M 现在晚上连接美国LA的更慢了 以前晚上也有30M 现在变个位数 看来不只是我这里慢 可恶的14.213 IP段 |
![]() | 17 Actrace 2015-05-30 00:14:45 +08:00 vxtrans的中国节点转出去会好很多. |
![]() | 18 aiguozhedaodan 2015-05-30 00:18:38 +08:00 via Android 一直以来 电信去日本kddi略强于ntt 如果需要带宽不大,买个阿里云或者腾讯云,甚至是那种廉价的北京多线bgp的vps(出国走联通),都会好很多 |
![]() | 19 hack520 2015-05-30 00:20:49 +08:00 via iPhone 买softlayer jp 的vps呗,电信过去跑cn2,联通过去跑ntt。 |
20 902115 OP 为啥要17个IP的V P S...... 广州用香港Softlayer是多么幸福的事情 CN2过到日本的大多数网络都要15个以上的HOP,像conoha这种用ntt的都是掉包很多的 另外:要E3和i7做啥用? 脱机挂挂日服游戏 每个IP只挂一个账号 小号养大号 哈哈 |
![]() | 21 laiyingdong 2015-05-30 23:00:29 +08:00 国际精品网就算有也给不了你呀。况且也好不到哪里去 我用阿里云测试了一下 还是会丢包 就忍忍吧 |
![]() | 22 lguan 2015-06-03 12:27:45 +08:00 我在上海,用的也是国际精品网,30M下,10M上,我自己用的是linode日本的VPS,到日本的效果还是不错的,结果给你做个参考 ``` PING 157.7.117.199 (157.7.117.199): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 157.7.117.199: icmp_seq=0 ttl=48 time=68.204 ms 64 bytes from 157.7.117.199: icmp_seq=1 ttl=48 time=57.037 ms 64 bytes from 157.7.117.199: icmp_seq=2 ttl=48 time=57.589 ms 64 bytes from 157.7.117.199: icmp_seq=3 ttl=48 time=57.169 ms 64 bytes from 157.7.117.199: icmp_seq=4 ttl=48 time=56.639 ms 64 bytes from 157.7.117.199: icmp_seq=5 ttl=48 time=57.665 ms 64 bytes from 157.7.117.199: icmp_seq=6 ttl=48 time=57.738 ms 64 bytes from 157.7.117.199: icmp_seq=7 ttl=48 time=57.781 ms 64 bytes from 157.7.117.199: icmp_seq=8 ttl=48 time=56.248 ms 64 bytes from 157.7.117.199: icmp_seq=9 ttl=48 time=57.407 ms 64 bytes from 157.7.117.199: icmp_seq=10 ttl=48 time=57.189 ms 64 bytes from 157.7.117.199: icmp_seq=11 ttl=48 time=56.778 ms 64 bytes from 157.7.117.199: icmp_seq=12 ttl=48 time=57.101 ms 64 bytes from 157.7.117.199: icmp_seq=13 ttl=48 time=57.299 ms 64 bytes from 157.7.117.199: icmp_seq=14 ttl=48 time=56.860 ms 64 bytes from 157.7.117.199: icmp_seq=15 ttl=48 time=57.350 ms 64 bytes from 157.7.117.199: icmp_seq=16 ttl=48 time=57.104 ms 64 bytes from 157.7.117.199: icmp_seq=17 ttl=48 time=57.606 ms 64 bytes from 157.7.117.199: icmp_seq=18 ttl=48 time=56.957 ms 64 bytes from 157.7.117.199: icmp_seq=19 ttl=48 time=57.141 ms 64 bytes from 157.7.117.199: icmp_seq=20 ttl=48 time=57.374 ms 64 bytes from 157.7.117.199: icmp_seq=21 ttl=48 time=57.796 ms 64 bytes from 157.7.117.199: icmp_seq=22 ttl=48 time=57.523 ms 64 bytes from 157.7.117.199: icmp_seq=23 ttl=48 time=56.724 ms 64 bytes from 157.7.117.199: icmp_seq=24 ttl=48 time=57.663 ms 64 bytes from 157.7.117.199: icmp_seq=25 ttl=48 time=56.872 ms 64 bytes from 157.7.117.199: icmp_seq=26 ttl=48 time=57.447 ms 64 bytes from 157.7.117.199: icmp_seq=27 ttl=48 time=57.388 ms 64 bytes from 157.7.117.199: icmp_seq=28 ttl=48 time=57.479 ms 64 bytes from 157.7.117.199: icmp_seq=29 ttl=48 time=57.136 ms 64 bytes from 157.7.117.199: icmp_seq=30 ttl=48 time=56.901 ms 64 bytes from 157.7.117.199: icmp_seq=31 ttl=48 time=56.966 ms 64 bytes from 157.7.117.199: icmp_seq=32 ttl=48 time=57.636 ms 64 bytes from 157.7.117.199: icmp_seq=33 ttl=48 time=57.390 ms 64 bytes from 157.7.117.199: icmp_seq=34 ttl=48 time=56.980 ms 64 bytes from 157.7.117.199: icmp_seq=35 ttl=48 time=56.697 ms 64 bytes from 157.7.117.199: icmp_seq=36 ttl=48 time=57.055 ms ^C --- 157.7.117.199 ping statistics --- 37 packets transmitted, 37 packets received, 0.0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 56.248/57.511/68.204/1.818 ms ``` |
23 digimoon 2015-06-04 09:44:47 +08:00 同问广州用户如果需要日本ip目前有什么好的解决方法,现在在用的这家ss慢成狗 |
24 aru 2015-06-04 10:10:45 +08:00 softlayer 日本节点效果还不错,价格贵了点,如果有几个人共享还可以 |